FC St. Pauli v 1. FC Heidenheim
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC St. Pauli beat 1. FC Heidenheim 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Stefan Schimmer for 1+ shots total (79%, had 4). Its clearest miss: James Sands for 1+ fouls committed (72%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Schimmer | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 4 | ✓ |
| Marvin Pieringer | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Martijn Kaars | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| James Sands | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marvin Pieringer | fouls drawn | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Thomas Keller | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mathias Honsak | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mathias Pereira Lage | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mathias Pereira Lage | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mathias Pereira Lage | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 0 | ✗ |
| Arijon Ibrahimović | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 45% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 39% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 37% | 6 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- 1. FC Heidenheim 2–0 FC St. Pauli Apr 2026
- 1. FC Heidenheim 0–2 FC St. Pauli Jan 2025
- FC St. Pauli 0–2 1. FC Heidenheim Aug 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC St. Pauli v 1. FC Heidenheim?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC St. Pauli v 1. FC Heidenheim?
The most confident call it got wrong was James Sands at 72% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.