Holstein Kiel v FC St. Pauli
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Holstein Kiel lost to FC St. Pauli 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Noah Weißhaupt for 1+ fouls drawn (87%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Morgan Guilavogui for 1+ shots total (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Weißhaupt | fouls drawn | 1+ | 87% | 4 | ✓ |
| Danel Sinani | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Elias Saad | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Morgan Guilavogui | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Morgan Guilavogui | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Oladapo Afolayan | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Oladapo Afolayan | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 4 | ✓ |
| Phil Harres | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Elias Saad | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Danel Sinani | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Shuto Machino | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alexander Bernhardsson | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jackson Irvine | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Morgan Guilavogui | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 48% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 41% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 40% | 7 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC St. Pauli 3–1 Holstein Kiel Nov 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Holstein Kiel v FC St. Pauli?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Holstein Kiel v FC St. Pauli?
The most confident call it got wrong was Morgan Guilavogui at 80% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.