Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
UEFA Champions League · 25/26

Man City v Real Madrid

How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Man City1 – 2 Real Madrid 17 Mar 2026
10/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Man City lost to Real Madrid 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Erling Haaland for 1+ shots total (80%, had 7). Its clearest miss: Jérémy Doku for 1+ fouls drawn (83%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Clement Turpin refereed this match 3.60cards a game· league 3.96 25games
Clement Turpin's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Jérémy Doku fouls drawn 1+ 83% 0
Omar Marmoush shots total 1+ 82% 0
Erling Haaland shots total 1+ 80% 7
Kylian Mbappé shots total 1+ 79% 1
Brahim Díaz fouls drawn 1+ 79% 0
Omar Marmoush fouls drawn 1+ 77% 3
Vinícius Júnior fouls drawn 1+ 75% 1
Antoine Semenyo fouls committed 1+ 75% 1
Tijjani Reijnders shots total 1+ 73% 1
Antoine Semenyo shots total 1+ 72% 1
Rayan Cherki fouls drawn 1+ 72% 1
Rayan Cherki shots total 1+ 71% 4
Vinícius Júnior shots total 1+ 70% 7
Omar Marmoush fouls committed 1+ 70% 0

How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 62% Yes
Match goals O2.5 61% 3 goals
Match cards O4.5 16% 4 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Man City v Real Madrid?

10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Man City v Real Madrid?

The most confident call it got wrong was Jérémy Doku at 83% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.