Red Bull Salzburg v GNK Dinamo Zagreb
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Red Bull Salzburg lost to GNK Dinamo Zagreb 0–2, the SharpXI model made 12 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Kamil Piątkowski for 1+ tackles (81%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Stefan Bajčetić for 1+ shots total (77%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Piątkowski | tackles | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Raúl Torrente | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Aleksa Terzić | tackles | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | fouls drawn | 1+ | 65% | 0 | ✗ |
| Aleksa Terzić | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Raúl Torrente | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kamil Piątkowski | fouls committed | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
| Aleksa Terzić | fouls committed | 1+ | 60% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | shots on target | 1+ | 53% | 0 | ✗ |
| Aleksa Terzić | fouls drawn | 1+ | 50% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kamil Piątkowski | shots total | 1+ | 48% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total Fouls committed Fouls drawn Shots on target
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 83% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 67% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 26% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Red Bull Salzburg v GNK Dinamo Zagreb?
7 of its 12 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Red Bull Salzburg v GNK Dinamo Zagreb?
The most confident call it got wrong was Stefan Bajčetić at 77% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.