FC Groningen v RKC Waalwijk
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC Groningen beat RKC Waalwijk 6–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Thom van Bergen for 1+ shots total (91%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Romano Postema for 1+ shots total (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romano Postema | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Noam Emeran | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Thom van Bergen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Chris Lokesa | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Michiel Kramer | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Luciano Valente | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Richonell Margaret | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yassin Oukili | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dave Kwakman | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 4 | ✓ |
| Leandro Bacuna | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Denilho Cleonise | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stije Resink | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 6 | ✓ |
| Tim van de Loo | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jorg Schreuders | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- RKC Waalwijk 1–2 FC Groningen Aug 2024
- RKC Waalwijk 2–1 FC Groningen Apr 2023
- FC Groningen 2–3 RKC Waalwijk Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC Groningen v RKC Waalwijk?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC Groningen v RKC Waalwijk?
The most confident call it got wrong was Romano Postema at 91% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.