PEC Zwolle v NEC Nijmegen
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before PEC Zwolle lost to NEC Nijmegen 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 4 landed — the strongest being Tjaronn Chery for 1+ shots total (96%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Bryan Linssen for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tjaronn Chery | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 4 | ✓ |
| Bryan Linssen | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Emre Mor | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Noé Lebreton | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ibrahim Cissoko | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Elias Sørensen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Koen Kostons | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tjaronn Chery | shots on target | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Dušan Tadić | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Willum Thor Willumsson | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Thijs Oosting | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bryan Linssen | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamiro Monteiro | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Gabriel Reiziger | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- NEC Nijmegen 2–1 PEC Zwolle Jan 2026
- PEC Zwolle 2–2 NEC Nijmegen Oct 2025
- PEC Zwolle 0–1 NEC Nijmegen Jan 2025
- NEC Nijmegen 1–0 PEC Zwolle Aug 2024
- NEC Nijmegen 2–2 PEC Zwolle Apr 2024
- PEC Zwolle 1–3 NEC Nijmegen Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on PEC Zwolle v NEC Nijmegen?
4 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on PEC Zwolle v NEC Nijmegen?
The most confident call it got wrong was Bryan Linssen at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.