PSV Eindhoven v SC Heerenveen
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before PSV Eindhoven beat SC Heerenveen 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Sven Mijnans for 1+ shots total (94%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Ivan Perišić for 1+ shots total (87%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sven Mijnans | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 6 | ✓ |
| Ruben van Bommel | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Esmir Bajraktarević | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Maxence Rivera | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ivan Perišić | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Guus Til | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jacob Trenskow | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marko Farji | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Dylan Vente | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sven Mijnans | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kodai Sano | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Noah Fernandez | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Filip Kostić | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Levi Smans | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- PSV Eindhoven 3–1 SC Heerenveen Feb 2026
- SC Heerenveen 0–2 PSV Eindhoven Dec 2025
- PSV Eindhoven 2–1 SC Heerenveen Mar 2025
- SC Heerenveen 1–0 PSV Eindhoven Dec 2024
- SC Heerenveen 0–8 PSV Eindhoven Apr 2024
- PSV Eindhoven 2–0 SC Heerenveen Dec 2023
- PSV Eindhoven 3–3 SC Heerenveen May 2023
- SC Heerenveen 0–1 PSV Eindhoven Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on PSV Eindhoven v SC Heerenveen?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on PSV Eindhoven v SC Heerenveen?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ivan Perišić at 87% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.