SC Heerenveen v FC Utrecht
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SC Heerenveen drew with FC Utrecht 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Jacob Trenskow for 1+ shots total (91%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Yoann Cathline for 1+ shots total (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Trenskow | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 5 | ✓ |
| Maxence Rivera | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jesper Karlsson | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Yoann Cathline | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Can Bozdoğan | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Dylan Vente | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Luca Oyen | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ringo Meerveld | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gjivai Zechiël | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Luuk Brouwers | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dani De Wit | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jacob Trenskow | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 2 | ✓ |
| Maxence Rivera | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jesper Karlsson | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC Utrecht 3–2 SC Heerenveen May 2026
- FC Utrecht 2–2 SC Heerenveen Sep 2025
- FC Utrecht 2–0 SC Heerenveen Mar 2025
- SC Heerenveen 1–1 FC Utrecht Aug 2024
- SC Heerenveen 2–3 FC Utrecht Apr 2024
- FC Utrecht 0–2 SC Heerenveen Aug 2023
- FC Utrecht 1–0 SC Heerenveen Feb 2023
- SC Heerenveen 1–2 FC Utrecht Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SC Heerenveen v FC Utrecht?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SC Heerenveen v FC Utrecht?
The most confident call it got wrong was Yoann Cathline at 91% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.