SC Heerenveen v PEC Zwolle
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SC Heerenveen lost to PEC Zwolle 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Maxence Rivera for 1+ shots total (94%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Jacob Trenskow for 1+ shots on target (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxence Rivera | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 5 | ✓ |
| Jacob Trenskow | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Dylan Vente | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Lanroy Machine | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Elias Sørensen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Koen Kostons | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Levi Smans | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ringo Meerveld | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Maxence Rivera | shots on target | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jacob Trenskow | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Thijs Oosting | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tobias Sommer | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dylan Mbayo | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Lanroy Machine | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- SC Heerenveen 4–2 PEC Zwolle Feb 2026
- PEC Zwolle 2–1 SC Heerenveen Nov 2025
- PEC Zwolle 1–1 SC Heerenveen Feb 2025
- SC Heerenveen 1–1 PEC Zwolle Oct 2024
- SC Heerenveen 2–0 PEC Zwolle Mar 2024
- PEC Zwolle 2–2 SC Heerenveen Jan 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SC Heerenveen v PEC Zwolle?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SC Heerenveen v PEC Zwolle?
The most confident call it got wrong was Jacob Trenskow at 76% for shots on target — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.