Las Palmas v Valencia
How the SharpXI model rated this La Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Las Palmas lost to Valencia 2–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Rafa Mir for 1+ shots total (94%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Viti Rozada for 1+ tackles (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafa Mir | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Hugo Duro | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Viti Rozada | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Manuel Fuster | fouls drawn | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| José Luis Gayà | tackles | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pepelu | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mika Mármol | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Álex Muñoz | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stefan Bajčetić | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Dário Essugo | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Marvin Park | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sandro Ramírez | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Adnan Januzaj | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Manuel Fuster | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 58% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 54% | 2 cards | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 50% | 5 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Valencia 2–3 Las Palmas Oct 2024
- Las Palmas 2–0 Valencia Feb 2024
- Valencia 1–0 Las Palmas Aug 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Las Palmas v Valencia?
7 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Las Palmas v Valencia?
The most confident call it got wrong was Viti Rozada at 91% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the La Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.