Georgia v Ukraine
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Nations League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Georgia drew with Ukraine 0–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Khvicha Kvaratskhelia for 1+ shots total (98%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Giorgi Tsitaishvili for 1+ shots total (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
4 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khvicha Kvaratskhelia | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 4 | ✓ |
| Georges Mikautadze | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 1 | ✓ |
| Roman Yaremchuk | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Giorgi Chakvetadze | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Giorgi Kochorashvili | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Giorgi Tsitaishvili | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Vladyslav Vanat | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Giorgi Chakvetadze | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Giorgi Kochorashvili | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Giorgi Tsitaishvili | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 3 | ✓ |
| Saba Goglichidze | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Georges Mikautadze | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Khvicha Kvaratskhelia | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Khvicha Kvaratskhelia | shots on target | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Georgia 1–1 Ukraine Nov 2024
- Ukraine 1–0 Georgia Oct 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Georgia v Ukraine?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Georgia v Ukraine?
The most confident call it got wrong was Giorgi Tsitaishvili at 78% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Nations League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.