Hull City v Man Utd
How the SharpXI model rated this Premier League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Hull City beat Man Utd 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Matheus Cunha for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Marcus Rashford for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matheus Cunha | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Benjamin Šeško | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Marcus Rashford | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mohamed Belloumi | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Patrick Dorgu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Patrick Dorgu | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Andrey Santos | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Cody Drameh | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Youri Tielemans | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Matt Crooks | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Noussair Mazraoui | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Bryan Mbeumo | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 4 | ✓ |
| Bruno Fernandes | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Oli McBurnie | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Hull City v Man Utd?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Hull City v Man Utd?
The most confident call it got wrong was Marcus Rashford at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Premier League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.