CF Estrela Amadora v Rio Ave
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before CF Estrela Amadora lost to Rio Ave 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Kikas for 1+ shots total (98%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Dario Špikić for 1+ shots total (86%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kikas | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 1 | ✓ |
| André Luiz | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ianis Stoica | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Clayton | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dario Špikić | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jorge Meireles | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Oumar Ngom | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sidny Lopes Cabral | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kikas | shots on target | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Antonis Papakanellos | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Robinho | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Abraham Marcus | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Clayton | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marios Vrousai | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Rio Ave 3–3 CF Estrela Amadora Sep 2026
- Rio Ave 2–1 CF Estrela Amadora Mar 2026
- Rio Ave 2–0 CF Estrela Amadora May 2025
- CF Estrela Amadora 1–0 Rio Ave Dec 2024
- CF Estrela Amadora 2–2 Rio Ave Apr 2024
- Rio Ave 1–1 CF Estrela Amadora Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on CF Estrela Amadora v Rio Ave?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on CF Estrela Amadora v Rio Ave?
The most confident call it got wrong was Dario Špikić at 86% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.