FC Porto v Gil Vicente
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC Porto beat Gil Vicente 3–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Borja Sainz for 1+ shots total (98%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Pepê for 1+ shots total (63%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borja Sainz | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 1 | ✓ |
| Samu Aghehowa | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 2 | ✓ |
| William Gomes | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Gabri Veiga | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rodrigo Mora | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tidjany Touré | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Murilo | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Luís Esteves | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gustavo Varela | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Samu Aghehowa | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Santi García | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 2 | ✓ |
| Pepê | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Borja Sainz | shots on target | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| William Gomes | shots on target | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Gil Vicente 0–2 FC Porto Aug 2025
- Gil Vicente 3–1 FC Porto Jan 2025
- FC Porto 3–0 Gil Vicente Aug 2024
- Gil Vicente 1–1 FC Porto Feb 2024
- FC Porto 2–1 Gil Vicente Sep 2023
- FC Porto 1–2 Gil Vicente Feb 2023
- Gil Vicente 0–2 FC Porto Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC Porto v Gil Vicente?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC Porto v Gil Vicente?
The most confident call it got wrong was Pepê at 63% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.