FC Porto v Rio Ave
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC Porto beat Rio Ave 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being William Gomes for 1+ shots total (98%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Deniz Gül for 1+ shots total (96%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Gomes | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 1 | ✓ |
| Oskar Pietuszewski | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rodrigo Mora | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Deniz Gül | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Gabri Veiga | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 5 | ✓ |
| Diogo Bezerra | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jalen Blesa | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pablo Rosario | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Deniz Gül | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| William Gomes | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pepê | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Karem Zoabi | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Victor Froholdt | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 3 | ✓ |
| Marios Vrousai | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Rio Ave 0–2 FC Porto Aug 2026
- Rio Ave 0–3 FC Porto Sep 2025
- Rio Ave 2–2 FC Porto Feb 2025
- FC Porto 2–0 Rio Ave Aug 2024
- FC Porto 0–0 Rio Ave Feb 2024
- Rio Ave 1–2 FC Porto Aug 2023
- FC Porto 1–0 Rio Ave Feb 2023
- Rio Ave 3–1 FC Porto Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC Porto v Rio Ave?
7 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC Porto v Rio Ave?
The most confident call it got wrong was Deniz Gül at 96% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.