Gil Vicente v CF Estrela Amadora
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Gil Vicente beat CF Estrela Amadora 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Kikas for 1+ shots total (96%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Rodrigo Pinho for 1+ shots total (98%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
9 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodrigo Pinho | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 0 | ✗ |
| Murilo | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kikas | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ianis Stoica | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alan Godoy | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Pablo Felipe | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gustavo Varela | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Luís Esteves | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jorge Meireles | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Santi García | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Joelson Fernandes | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kikas | shots on target | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sidny Lopes Cabral | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 5 | ✓ |
| Rodrigo Pinho | shots on target | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- CF Estrela Amadora 2–2 Gil Vicente Mar 2026
- CF Estrela Amadora 1–1 Gil Vicente Mar 2025
- Gil Vicente 3–0 CF Estrela Amadora Oct 2024
- CF Estrela Amadora 1–0 Gil Vicente May 2024
- Gil Vicente 1–1 CF Estrela Amadora Jan 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Gil Vicente v CF Estrela Amadora?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Gil Vicente v CF Estrela Amadora?
The most confident call it got wrong was Rodrigo Pinho at 98% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.