Hibernian v Aberdeen
How the SharpXI model rated this Scottish Premiership fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Hibernian drew with Aberdeen 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Martin Boyle for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Stuart Armstrong for 1+ shots total (62%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
See the full player stats boardPlayer markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Boyle | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Owen Elding | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Josh Mulligan | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kevin Nisbet | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Callum Wright | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Toyosi Olusanya | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Findlay Marshall | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
| Connor Ronan | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
| Adam Mayor | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jason Kerr | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stuart Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Felix Passlack | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Miguel Changa Chaiwa | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 2 | ✓ |
| Aremu Afeez | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Aberdeen 2–0 Hibernian Apr 2026
- Hibernian 2–0 Aberdeen Dec 2025
- Aberdeen 1–2 Hibernian Oct 2025
- Aberdeen 1–0 Hibernian Apr 2025
- Hibernian 2–0 Aberdeen Feb 2025
- Aberdeen 1–3 Hibernian Dec 2024
- Hibernian 3–3 Aberdeen Nov 2024
- Hibernian 0–4 Aberdeen May 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Hibernian v Aberdeen?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Hibernian v Aberdeen?
The most confident call it got wrong was Stuart Armstrong at 62% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Scottish Premiership?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.