Cremonese v Juventus
How the SharpXI model rated this Serie A fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Cremonese lost to Juventus 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Jeremy Sarmiento for 1+ tackles (97%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Teun Koopmeiners for 1+ shots total (95%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Sarmiento | tackles | 1+ | 97% | 1 | ✓ |
| Dušan Vlahović | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 5 | ✓ |
| Francisco Conceição | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Loïs Openda | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 4 | ✓ |
| Teun Koopmeiners | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 0 | ✗ |
| Loïs Openda | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dušan Vlahović | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tommaso Barbieri | tackles | 1+ | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
| Federico Bonazzoli | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Khéphren Thuram | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Manuel Locatelli | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 6 | ✓ |
| Federico Bonazzoli | fouls drawn | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Martín Payero | fouls drawn | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Francisco Conceição | fouls drawn | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total Fouls drawn Shots on target
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 44% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 41% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 21% | 1 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Juventus 5–0 Cremonese Jan 2026
- Juventus 2–0 Cremonese May 2023
- Cremonese 0–1 Juventus Jan 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Cremonese v Juventus?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Cremonese v Juventus?
The most confident call it got wrong was Teun Koopmeiners at 95% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Serie A?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.