Lecce v Sampdoria
How the SharpXI model rated this Serie A fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Lecce drew with Sampdoria 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Gabriel Strefezza for 1+ shots total (95%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Manolo Gabbiadini for 1+ shots total (95%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rémi Oudin | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 5 | ✓ |
| Assan Ceesay | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 4 | ✓ |
| Gabriel Strefezza | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 3 | ✓ |
| Federico Di Francesco | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 4 | ✓ |
| Manolo Gabbiadini | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 0 | ✗ |
| Manolo Gabbiadini | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gabriel Strefezza | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Abdelhamid Sabiri | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Alexis Blin | tackles | 1+ | 90% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jesé Rodríguez | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sam Lammers | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Abdelhamid Sabiri | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Morten Hjulmand | tackles | 1+ | 87% | 4 | ✓ |
| Samuel Umtiti | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 45% | 5 cards | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 36% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 29% | 2 goals | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sampdoria 0–2 Lecce Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Lecce v Sampdoria?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Lecce v Sampdoria?
The most confident call it got wrong was Manolo Gabbiadini at 95% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Serie A?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.