Pisa v Atalanta
How the SharpXI model rated this Serie A fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Pisa drew with Atalanta 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Charles De Ketelaere for 1+ shots total (95%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Mehdi Léris for 1+ tackles (97%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mehdi Léris | tackles | 1+ | 97% | 0 | ✗ |
| Charles De Ketelaere | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gianluca Scamacca | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Giacomo Raspadori | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nikola Krstović | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nicola Zalewski | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nikola Krstović | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Marius Marin | tackles | 1+ | 90% | 3 | ✓ |
| Nicola Zalewski | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stefano Moreo | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 4 | ✓ |
| Matteo Tramoni | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marten de Roon | tackles | 1+ | 87% | 4 | ✓ |
| Michel Aebischer | tackles | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Francesco Coppola | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total Fouls drawn Shots on target
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 53% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 52% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 12% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Atalanta 1–1 Pisa Aug 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Pisa v Atalanta?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Pisa v Atalanta?
The most confident call it got wrong was Mehdi Léris at 97% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Serie A?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.