Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell usUpdated daily. Tell us
SharpXI©
Bundesliga 25/26

1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Union Berlin

How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

1. FC Heidenheim3 – 1 1. FC Union Berlin 11 Apr 2026
6/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before 1. FC Heidenheim beat 1. FC Union Berlin 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 6 landed — the strongest being Andrej Ilić for 1+ shots total (93%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Stefan Schimmer for 1+ shots total (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Christian Dingert refereed this match 4.29cards a gameleague 4.07 56games
Christian Dingert's card record
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip ›

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Andrej Ilić shots total 1+ 93% 6 ✓
Stefan Schimmer shots total 1+ 91% 0 ✗
Livan Burcu shots total 1+ 91% 0 ✗
Oliver Burke shots total 1+ 89% 0 ✗
András Schäfer tackles 1+ 86% 2 ✓
Budu Zivzivadze shots total 1+ 84% 2 ✓
Marvin Pieringer shots total 1+ 83% 0 ✗
Ilyas Ansah shots total 1+ 83% 0 ✗
Tom Alexander Rothe tackles 1+ 83% 0 ✗
Mathias Honsak shots total 1+ 83% 2 ✓
Alex Král shots total 1+ 80% 0 ✗
András Schäfer fouls committed 1+ 80% 1 ✓
Tim Skarke shots total 1+ 80% 0 ✗
Hennes Behrens tackles 1+ 80% 1 ✓

How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 59% Yes ✓
Match goals O2.5 55% 4 goals ✓
Match cards O4.5 29% 2 cards ✗

How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on 1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Union Berlin?

6 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on 1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Union Berlin?

The most confident call it got wrong was Stefan Schimmer at 91% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.