1. FC Heidenheim v SV Werder Bremen
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before 1. FC Heidenheim drew with SV Werder Bremen 2–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Victor Okoh Boniface for 1+ shots total (84%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Justin Njinmah for 1+ shots total (81%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Okoh Boniface | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Stefan Schimmer | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Justin Njinmah | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Budu Zivzivadze | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marco Grüll | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Leonardo Bittencourt | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Arijon Ibrahimović | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 8 | ✓ |
| Samuel Mbangula | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mikkel Kaufmann | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jens Stage | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 4 | ✓ |
| Leonardo Bittencourt | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Samuel Mbangula | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls drawn · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 57% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 55% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 43% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- SV Werder Bremen 2–0 1. FC Heidenheim Feb 2026
- 1. FC Heidenheim 1–4 SV Werder Bremen May 2025
- SV Werder Bremen 3–3 1. FC Heidenheim Jan 2025
- SV Werder Bremen 1–2 1. FC Heidenheim Feb 2024
- 1. FC Heidenheim 4–2 SV Werder Bremen Sep 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on 1. FC Heidenheim v SV Werder Bremen?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on 1. FC Heidenheim v SV Werder Bremen?
The most confident call it got wrong was Justin Njinmah at 81% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.