Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Bundesliga · 25/26

SV Werder Bremen v 1. FC Heidenheim

How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

SV Werder Bremen2 – 0 1. FC Heidenheim 28 Feb 2026
9/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before SV Werder Bremen beat 1. FC Heidenheim 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Keke Topp for 1+ shots total (84%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Christian Conteh for 1+ shots total (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Florian Badstubner refereed this match 3.55cards/game 0.87×vs league 53games
Florian Badstubner's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Keke Topp shots total 1+ 84% 3
Stefan Schimmer shots total 1+ 81% 1
Marvin Pieringer fouls committed 1+ 80% 1
Jovan Milošević shots total 1+ 79% 2
Christian Conteh shots total 1+ 78% 0
Benedikt Gimber fouls committed 1+ 78% 0
Olivier Deman fouls committed 1+ 77% 2
Marco Grüll shots total 1+ 76% 0
Arijon Ibrahimović shots total 1+ 74% 3
Benedikt Gimber fouls drawn 1+ 72% 3
Marvin Pieringer shots total 1+ 72% 0
Romano Schmid shots total 1+ 72% 3
Keke Topp fouls committed 1+ 71% 0
Jens Stage shots total 1+ 71% 4

How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 57% No
Match goals O2.5 57% 2 goals
Match cards O4.5 35% 1 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on SV Werder Bremen v 1. FC Heidenheim?

9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on SV Werder Bremen v 1. FC Heidenheim?

The most confident call it got wrong was Christian Conteh at 78% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.