Hamburger SV v 1. FSV Mainz 05
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Hamburger SV lost to 1. FSV Mainz 05 0–5, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Phillip Tietz for 1+ shots total (93%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Stefan Posch for 1+ tackles (92%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillip Tietz | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 4 | ✓ |
| Terem Moffi | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nicolás Capaldo | tackles | 1+ | 92% | 4 | ✓ |
| Stefan Posch | tackles | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nadiem Amiri | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sheraldo Becker | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Patson Daka | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ransford Yeboah Königsdörffer | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Otto Stange | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Bilal Nadir | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bilal Nadir | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Fábio Vieira | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Anthony Caci | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Albert Grønbæk | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 65% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 65% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 50% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- 1. FSV Mainz 05 1–1 Hamburger SV Feb 2026
- Hamburger SV 4–0 1. FSV Mainz 05 Oct 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Hamburger SV v 1. FSV Mainz 05?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Hamburger SV v 1. FSV Mainz 05?
The most confident call it got wrong was Stefan Posch at 92% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.