Holstein Kiel v Eintracht Frankfurt
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Holstein Kiel lost to Eintracht Frankfurt 2–4, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Omar Marmoush for 1+ shots total (94%, had 7). Its clearest miss: Steven Skrzybski for 1+ shots total (88%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar Marmoush | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 7 | ✓ |
| Igor Matanović | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Farès Chaïbi | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 1 | ✓ |
| Eric Ebimbe | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 3 | ✓ |
| Shuto Machino | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 3 | ✓ |
| Steven Skrzybski | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Omar Marmoush | fouls drawn | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Magnus Knudsen | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Lewis Holtby | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nicolai Remberg | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Benedikt Pichler | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Eric Ebimbe | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Finn Porath | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Lasse Rosenboom | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 34% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Holstein Kiel v Eintracht Frankfurt?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Holstein Kiel v Eintracht Frankfurt?
The most confident call it got wrong was Steven Skrzybski at 88% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.