Holstein Kiel v FC Bayern München
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Holstein Kiel lost to FC Bayern München 1–6, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Harry Kane for 1+ shots total (90%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Michael Olise for 1+ fouls drawn (86%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harry Kane | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 6 | ✓ |
| Michael Olise | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Serge Gnabry | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 4 | ✓ |
| Michael Olise | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jamal Musiala | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jamal Musiala | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kingsley Coman | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Thomas Müller | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| João Palhinha | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 3 | ✓ |
| João Palhinha | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kingsley Coman | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sacha Boey | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| João Palhinha | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Shuto Machino | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls drawn · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 65% | 1 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC Bayern München 4–3 Holstein Kiel Feb 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Holstein Kiel v FC Bayern München?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Holstein Kiel v FC Bayern München?
The most confident call it got wrong was Michael Olise at 86% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.