TSG Hoffenheim v FC St. Pauli
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before TSG Hoffenheim lost to FC St. Pauli 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Andrej Kramarić for 1+ shots total (91%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Lars Ritzka for 1+ tackles (92%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Ritzka | tackles | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Andrej Kramarić | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Danel Sinani | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Fisnik Asllani | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mathias Pereira Lage | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Wouter Burger | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Joel Chima Fujita | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Andrej Kramarić | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Alexander Prass | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Manolis Saliakas | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Wouter Burger | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| James Sands | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Grischa Prömel | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Hauke Wahl | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total Shots on target Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 55% | 1 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 55% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 24% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC St. Pauli 0–3 TSG Hoffenheim Oct 2025
- FC St. Pauli 1–0 TSG Hoffenheim Mar 2025
- TSG Hoffenheim 0–2 FC St. Pauli Nov 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on TSG Hoffenheim v FC St. Pauli?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on TSG Hoffenheim v FC St. Pauli?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lars Ritzka at 92% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.