VfL Bochum 1848 v 1. FC Köln
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before VfL Bochum 1848 drew with 1. FC Köln 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Luca Waldschmidt for 1+ shots total (85%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Mark Uth for 1+ shots total (81%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luca Waldschmidt | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Davie Selke | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 5 | ✓ |
| Mark Uth | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jan Uwe Thielmann | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Takuma Asano | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 4 | ✓ |
| Luca Waldschmidt | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kevin Stöger | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kevin Stöger | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 5 | ✓ |
| Christopher Antwi-Adjei | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Eric Martel | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Florian Kainz | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mark Uth | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mark Uth | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 3 | ✓ |
| Davie Selke | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls drawn · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 60% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 57% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 34% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- 1. FC Köln 2–1 VfL Bochum 1848 Apr 2024
- 1. FC Köln 0–2 VfL Bochum 1848 Mar 2023
- VfL Bochum 1848 1–1 1. FC Köln Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on VfL Bochum 1848 v 1. FC Köln?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on VfL Bochum 1848 v 1. FC Köln?
The most confident call it got wrong was Mark Uth at 81% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.