Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Bundesliga · 24/25

VfL Bochum 1848 v FC Augsburg

How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

VfL Bochum 18481 – 2 FC Augsburg 12 Apr 2025
13/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before VfL Bochum 1848 lost to FC Augsburg 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Frank Onyeka for 1+ fouls drawn (85%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Alexis Claude-Maurice for 1+ fouls committed (72%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Martin Petersen refereed this match 4.62cards/game 1.13×vs league 42games
Martin Petersen's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Frank Onyeka fouls drawn 1+ 85% 3
Ibrahima Sissoko fouls committed 1+ 82% 4
Phillip Tietz shots total 1+ 81% 1
Samuel Essende fouls committed 1+ 80% 1
Matúš Bero fouls committed 1+ 80% 2
Elvis Rexhbeçaj fouls drawn 1+ 79% 1
Samuel Essende shots total 1+ 79% 1
Phillip Tietz fouls committed 1+ 78% 2
Giorgos Masouras shots total 1+ 78% 7
Alexis Claude-Maurice shots total 1+ 77% 3
Samuel Essende fouls drawn 1+ 76% 2
Philipp Hofmann shots total 1+ 74% 6
Alexis Claude-Maurice fouls committed 1+ 72% 0
Alexis Claude-Maurice fouls drawn 1+ 72% 2

How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Fouls committed · Shots total

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 52% Yes
Match cards O4.5 49% 4 cards
Match goals O2.5 47% 3 goals

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on VfL Bochum 1848 v FC Augsburg?

13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on VfL Bochum 1848 v FC Augsburg?

The most confident call it got wrong was Alexis Claude-Maurice at 72% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.