Blackpool v Queens Park Rangers
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Blackpool beat Queens Park Rangers 6–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Lyndon Dykes for 1+ shots total (95%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Sinclair Armstrong for 1+ shots total (90%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyndon Dykes | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tim Iroegbunam | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sinclair Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamal Lowe | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Chris Martin | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kenny Dougall | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sam Field | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Albert Adomah | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Taylor Richards | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Taylor Richards | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Charlie Patiño | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tim Iroegbunam | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Morgan Rogers | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| CJ Hamilton | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 23% | 4 cards | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 13% | 7 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 13% | Yes | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards Match goals
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Queens Park Rangers 0–1 Blackpool Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Blackpool v Queens Park Rangers?
7 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Blackpool v Queens Park Rangers?
The most confident call it got wrong was Sinclair Armstrong at 90% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.