Bristol City v Charlton Athletic
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Bristol City drew with Charlton Athletic 0–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Scott Twine for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Charlie Kelman for 1+ shots total (87%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
13 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Twine | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Miles Leaburn | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Charlie Kelman | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ross McCrorie | fouls committed | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Emil Riis Jacobsen | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Robert Apter | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Anis Mehmeti | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 4 | ✓ |
| Sonny Carey | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Anis Mehmeti | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Robert Apter | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Scott Twine | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Conor Coventry | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Lloyd Jones | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Greg Docherty | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls committed Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 8% | 1 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Charlton Athletic 1–2 Bristol City Apr 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Bristol City v Charlton Athletic?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Bristol City v Charlton Athletic?
The most confident call it got wrong was Charlie Kelman at 87% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.