Coventry City v Blackpool
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Coventry City lost to Blackpool 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Gustavo Hamer for 1+ shots total (80%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Kasey Palmer for 1+ fouls committed (77%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Hamer | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kasey Palmer | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kasey Palmer | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gary Madine | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 6 | ✓ |
| Gustavo Hamer | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jerry Yates | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 3 | ✓ |
| Charlie Patiño | fouls drawn | 1+ | 72% | 4 | ✓ |
| Callum O'Hare | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kasey Palmer | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 6 | ✓ |
| Ben Sheaf | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 3 | ✓ |
| Callum O'Hare | fouls committed | 1+ | 69% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kenny Dougall | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 1 | ✓ |
| CJ Hamilton | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamie Allen | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 50% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Blackpool 1–4 Coventry City Mar 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Coventry City v Blackpool?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Coventry City v Blackpool?
The most confident call it got wrong was Kasey Palmer at 77% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.