Plymouth Argyle v Southampton
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Plymouth Argyle lost to Southampton 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Nathan Tella for 1+ fouls committed (89%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Adam Armstrong for 1+ fouls committed (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan Tella | fouls committed | 1+ | 89% | 5 | ✓ |
| Che Adams | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Adam Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Nathan Tella | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Che Adams | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nathan Tella | fouls drawn | 1+ | 81% | 3 | ✓ |
| Samuel Edozie | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Stuart Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Shea Charles | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 4 | ✓ |
| Adam Armstrong | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Samuel Edozie | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Samuel Edozie | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Stuart Armstrong | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Bali Mumba | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 82% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 77% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 30% | 6 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Southampton 2–1 Plymouth Argyle Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Plymouth Argyle v Southampton?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Plymouth Argyle v Southampton?
The most confident call it got wrong was Adam Armstrong at 78% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.