Getafe v Las Palmas
How the SharpXI model rated this La Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Getafe lost to Las Palmas 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Sandro Ramírez for 1+ shots total (92%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Manuel Fuster for 1+ fouls drawn (93%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Fuster | fouls drawn | 1+ | 93% | 0 | ✗ |
| Christantus Uche | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Fábio Silva | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sandro Ramírez | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sandro Ramírez | fouls drawn | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Fábio Silva | fouls drawn | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Viti Rozada | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Diego Rico | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Dário Essugo | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Coba Da Costa | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Juan Iglesias | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Juan Bernat | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mauro Arambarri | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Juanmi | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 5 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Shots total Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 50% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 50% | 3 cards | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 48% | 4 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Las Palmas 1–2 Getafe Jan 2025
- Getafe 3–3 Las Palmas Mar 2024
- Las Palmas 2–0 Getafe Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Getafe v Las Palmas?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Getafe v Las Palmas?
The most confident call it got wrong was Manuel Fuster at 93% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the La Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.