Las Palmas v Athletic Club
How the SharpXI model rated this La Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Las Palmas lost to Athletic Club 2–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Iñaki Williams for 1+ shots total (92%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Mikel Vesga for 1+ tackles (86%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iñaki Williams | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nico Williams | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gorka Guruzeta | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sandro Ramírez | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Fabio González | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Beñat Prados | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Álex Muñoz | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mikel Vesga | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alex Suárez | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Marvin Park | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mika Mármol | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 5 | ✓ |
| Gorka Guruzeta | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 48% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 34% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 31% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Athletic Club 1–0 Las Palmas Apr 2025
- Las Palmas 0–2 Athletic Club Mar 2024
- Athletic Club 1–0 Las Palmas Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Las Palmas v Athletic Club?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Las Palmas v Athletic Club?
The most confident call it got wrong was Mikel Vesga at 86% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the La Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.