Nantes v Angers
How the SharpXI model rated this Ligue 1 fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Nantes lost to Angers 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Mostafa Mohamed for 1+ shots total (82%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Mostafa Mohamed for 1+ fouls drawn (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mostafa Mohamed | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Pierrick Capelle | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 3 | ✓ |
| Matthis Abline | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Goduine Koyalipou | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mohamed Kaba | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mostafa Mohamed | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Francis Coquelin | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ignatius Ganago | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Johann Lepenant | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Johann Lepenant | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Deiver Machado | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Haris Belkebla | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Matthis Abline | fouls drawn | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dehmaine Tabibou | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 43% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 37% | 1 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 29% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Angers 4–1 Nantes Dec 2025
- Nantes 0–1 Angers May 2025
- Angers 1–1 Nantes Sep 2024
- Nantes 1–0 Angers Jun 2023
- Angers 0–0 Nantes Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Nantes v Angers?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Nantes v Angers?
The most confident call it got wrong was Mostafa Mohamed at 78% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Ligue 1?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.