Stade de Reims v Clermont Foot
How the SharpXI model rated this Ligue 1 fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Stade de Reims beat Clermont Foot 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 6 landed — the strongest being Marshall Munetsi for 1+ fouls committed (88%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Komnen Andrić for 1+ fouls drawn (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marshall Munetsi | fouls committed | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Alidu Seidu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Komnen Andrić | fouls drawn | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Josh Wilson-Esbrand | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Amir Richardson | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Azor Matusiwa | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Keito Nakamura | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Muhammed-Cham Saračević | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 4 | ✓ |
| Oumar Diakité | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Grejohn Kyei | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Keito Nakamura | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Yohann Magnin | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Grejohn Kyei | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yunis Abdelhamid | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Fouls drawn · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 61% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 60% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 36% | 0 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Clermont Foot 4–1 Stade de Reims Apr 2024
- Clermont Foot 1–0 Stade de Reims Apr 2023
- Stade de Reims 2–4 Clermont Foot Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Stade de Reims v Clermont Foot?
6 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Stade de Reims v Clermont Foot?
The most confident call it got wrong was Komnen Andrić at 80% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Ligue 1?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.