Stade Rennais v Metz
How the SharpXI model rated this Ligue 1 fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Stade Rennais drew with Metz 0–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Esteban Lepaul for 1+ shots total (95%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Przemysław Frankowski for 1+ tackles (93%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esteban Lepaul | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Arnaud Nordin | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mousa Tamari | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ludovic Blas | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Valentin Rongier | tackles | 1+ | 93% | 5 | ✓ |
| Koffi Kouao | tackles | 1+ | 93% | 5 | ✓ |
| Przemysław Frankowski | tackles | 1+ | 93% | 0 | ✗ |
| Djaoui Cissé | tackles | 1+ | 93% | 0 | ✗ |
| Arnaud Nordin | fouls drawn | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Maxime Colin | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jean-Philippe Gbamin | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sebastian Szymański | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Quentin Merlin | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 7 | ✓ |
| Habibou Diallo | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 55% | 0 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 51% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 31% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Metz 0–1 Stade Rennais Nov 2025
- Metz 2–3 Stade Rennais May 2024
- Stade Rennais 5–1 Metz Aug 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Stade Rennais v Metz?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Stade Rennais v Metz?
The most confident call it got wrong was Przemysław Frankowski at 93% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Ligue 1?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.