Burnley v Sunderland
How the SharpXI model rated this Premier League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Burnley beat Sunderland 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Eliezer Mayenda for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Wilson Isidor for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Isidor | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Chemsdine Talbi | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Simon Adingra | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Eliezer Mayenda | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Trai Hume | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Patrick Roberts | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lyle Foster | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jacob Bruun Larsen | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jaidon Anthony | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Enzo Le Fée | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jenson Seelt | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Noah Sadiki | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Hannibal Mejbri | fouls drawn | 1+ | 81% | 2 | ✓ |
| Habib Diarra | fouls drawn | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 18% | 1 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sunderland 3–0 Burnley Feb 2026
- Burnley 0–0 Sunderland Jan 2025
- Sunderland 1–0 Burnley Aug 2024
- Burnley 0–0 Sunderland Mar 2023
- Sunderland 2–4 Burnley Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Burnley v Sunderland?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Burnley v Sunderland?
The most confident call it got wrong was Wilson Isidor at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Premier League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.