Sheffield United v Wolves
How the SharpXI model rated this Premier League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Sheffield United beat Wolves 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Matheus Cunha for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Saša Kalajdžić for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hwang Hee-chan | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Matheus Cunha | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Saša Kalajdžić | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tommy Doyle | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Rhian Brewster | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Vinícius Souza | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 5 | ✓ |
| Boubacar Traoré | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rayan Aït-Nouri | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mario Lemina | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Oliver Norwood | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Auston Trusty | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jean-Ricner Bellegarde | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Cameron Archer | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| James McAtee | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 62% | 5 cards | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 51% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 48% | 3 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sheffield United 0–1 Wolves Sep 2026
- Wolves 1–0 Sheffield United Feb 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Sheffield United v Wolves?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Sheffield United v Wolves?
The most confident call it got wrong was Saša Kalajdžić at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Premier League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.