Gil Vicente v Rio Ave
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Gil Vicente beat Rio Ave 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Carlos Eduardo for 1+ shots total (96%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Tamblé Monteiro for 1+ shots total (96%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Eduardo | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 3 | ✓ |
| Tamblé Monteiro | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Santi García | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jalen Blesa | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Diogo Bezerra | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Joelson Fernandes | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Gil Martins | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Andreas Ndoj | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ryan Guilherme | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jalen Blesa | shots on target | 1+ | 61% | 1 | ✓ |
| Carlos Eduardo | shots on target | 1+ | 61% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tamblé Monteiro | shots on target | 1+ | 61% | 0 | ✗ |
| Diogo Bezerra | shots on target | 1+ | 59% | 0 | ✗ |
| Diogo Nascimento | shots total | 1+ | 54% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Rio Ave 0–0 Gil Vicente May 2026
- Gil Vicente 2–2 Rio Ave Dec 2025
- Rio Ave 1–1 Gil Vicente May 2025
- Gil Vicente 1–1 Rio Ave Jan 2025
- Rio Ave 3–0 Gil Vicente Apr 2024
- Gil Vicente 1–1 Rio Ave Nov 2023
- Rio Ave 2–1 Gil Vicente Mar 2023
- Gil Vicente 2–2 Rio Ave Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Gil Vicente v Rio Ave?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Gil Vicente v Rio Ave?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tamblé Monteiro at 96% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.