SC Farense v Gil Vicente
How the SharpXI model rated this Primeira Liga fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SC Farense lost to Gil Vicente 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Jorge Aguirre for 1+ shots total (98%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Cauê for 1+ shots total (96%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
6 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorge Aguirre | shots total | 1+ | 98% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kanya Fujimoto | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tomané | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mehdi Merghem | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Elves Baldé | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 3 | ✓ |
| Darío Poveda | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Cauê | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jordi Mboula | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 0 | ✗ |
| Álex Bermejo Escribano | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Félix Correia | shots total | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marco Matias | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Santi García | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Mory Gbane | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Filipe Soares | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Gil Vicente 1–0 SC Farense Apr 2025
- Gil Vicente 2–0 SC Farense May 2024
- SC Farense 1–0 Gil Vicente Jan 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SC Farense v Gil Vicente?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SC Farense v Gil Vicente?
The most confident call it got wrong was Cauê at 96% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Primeira Liga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.