St. Mirren v St. Johnstone
How the SharpXI model rated this Scottish Premiership fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before St. Mirren beat St. Johnstone 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Jake Young for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Eseosa Sule for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eseosa Sule | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jake Young | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Samuel Ramos | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Josh Fowler | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Killian Phillips | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ruari Paton | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Chris Mochrie | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sam Stanton | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jamie Gullan | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Liam Donnelly | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ryan Carr | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Paul Nsio | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Luke Thomas | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Reece McAlear | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- St. Mirren 0–1 St. Johnstone Feb 2025
- St. Johnstone 2–3 St. Mirren Dec 2024
- St. Mirren 3–1 St. Johnstone Oct 2024
- St. Mirren 2–0 St. Johnstone Feb 2024
- St. Johnstone 1–0 St. Mirren Dec 2023
- St. Mirren 4–0 St. Johnstone Oct 2023
- St. Johnstone 1–1 St. Mirren Feb 2023
- St. Mirren 2–2 St. Johnstone Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on St. Mirren v St. Johnstone?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on St. Mirren v St. Johnstone?
The most confident call it got wrong was Eseosa Sule at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Scottish Premiership?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.