Bologna v Cremonese
How the SharpXI model rated this Serie A fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Bologna lost to Cremonese 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Riccardo Orsolini for 1+ shots total (95%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Martín Payero for 1+ fouls committed (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Castro | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 4 | ✓ |
| Riccardo Orsolini | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 6 | ✓ |
| Nicolò Cambiaghi | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nicolò Cambiaghi | fouls drawn | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Riccardo Orsolini | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Martín Payero | fouls committed | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jens Odgaard | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Federico Bonazzoli | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tommaso Pobega | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 7 | ✓ |
| Benjamín Domínguez | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tommaso Barbieri | tackles | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Federico Bonazzoli | fouls drawn | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Martín Payero | fouls drawn | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Warren Bondo | fouls drawn | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Shots on target Fouls committed Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 43% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 42% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 21% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Cremonese 1–2 Bologna Apr 2026
- Cremonese 1–5 Bologna May 2023
- Bologna 1–1 Cremonese Jan 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Bologna v Cremonese?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Bologna v Cremonese?
The most confident call it got wrong was Martín Payero at 89% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Serie A?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.