1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Köln
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before 1. FC Heidenheim drew with 1. FC Köln 2–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Tom Krauß for 1+ tackles (92%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Tim Siersleben for 1+ tackles (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Krauß | tackles | 1+ | 92% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ragnar Ache | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Said El Mala | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Marvin Pieringer | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Mathias Honsak | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Arijon Ibrahimović | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sirlord Conteh | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jan Uwe Thielmann | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jakub Kamiński | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Linton Maina | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Niklas Dorsch | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Denis Huseinbašić | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Tim Siersleben | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sebastian Sebulonsen | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 65% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 62% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 29% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- 1. FC Köln 1–3 1. FC Heidenheim May 2026
- 1. FC Heidenheim 4–1 1. FC Köln May 2024
- 1. FC Köln 1–1 1. FC Heidenheim Jan 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on 1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Köln?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on 1. FC Heidenheim v 1. FC Köln?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tim Siersleben at 80% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.