Blackpool v Huddersfield Town
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Blackpool drew with Huddersfield Town 2–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Martyn Waghorn for 1+ shots total (95%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Brahima Diarra for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Hungbo | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Martyn Waghorn | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 3 | ✓ |
| Brahima Diarra | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jerry Yates | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 2 | ✓ |
| Morgan Rogers | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Gary Madine | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kenny Dougall | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 6 | ✓ |
| Jonathan Hogg | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 5 | ✓ |
| David Kasumu | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Scott High | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Anthony Knockaert | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| CJ Hamilton | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tom Trybull | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Matty Pearson | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 29% | 5 cards | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 13% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 13% | Yes | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards Match goals
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Huddersfield Town 0–1 Blackpool Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Blackpool v Huddersfield Town?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Blackpool v Huddersfield Town?
The most confident call it got wrong was Brahima Diarra at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.