Huddersfield Town v Blackpool
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Huddersfield Town lost to Blackpool 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Theo Corbeanu for 1+ shots total (85%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Patrick Jones for 1+ shots total (81%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theo Corbeanu | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ian Poveda | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jerry Yates | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Patrick Jones | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tino Anjorin | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Daniel Ward | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sorba Thomas | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Patrick Jones | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Daniel Ward | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
| Patrick Jones | fouls drawn | 1+ | 67% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sorba Thomas | fouls drawn | 1+ | 67% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jonathan Hogg | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jon Russell | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tino Anjorin | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 7% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Blackpool 2–2 Huddersfield Town Feb 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Huddersfield Town v Blackpool?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Huddersfield Town v Blackpool?
The most confident call it got wrong was Patrick Jones at 81% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.