Leeds v Portsmouth
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Leeds drew with Portsmouth 3–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Georginio Rutter for 1+ fouls drawn (84%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Wilfried Gnonto for 1+ fouls drawn (82%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georginio Rutter | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 6 | ✓ |
| Callum Lang | fouls committed | 1+ | 83% | 4 | ✓ |
| Wilfried Gnonto | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Daniel James | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Wilfried Gnonto | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Georginio Rutter | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Georginio Rutter | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Samuel Silvera | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Callum Lang | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 4 | ✓ |
| Wilfried Gnonto | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 6 | ✓ |
| Andre Dozzell | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mateo Joseph | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
| Daniel James | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ilia Gruev | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Fouls committed · Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Portsmouth 1–0 Leeds Mar 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Leeds v Portsmouth?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Leeds v Portsmouth?
The most confident call it got wrong was Wilfried Gnonto at 82% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.