Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Championship · 23/24

Norwich v Rotherham United

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Norwich5 – 0 Rotherham United 9 Mar 2024
10/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Norwich beat Rotherham United 5–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Tom Eaves for 1+ fouls committed (86%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Jordan Hugill for 1+ fouls committed (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Charles Breakspear refereed this match

2 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record →

See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Jordan Hugill fouls committed 1+ 89% 0
Tom Eaves fouls committed 1+ 86% 3
Josh Sargent shots total 1+ 84% 5
Ashley Barnes shots total 1+ 78% 0
Tom Eaves shots total 1+ 77% 0
Jordan Hugill fouls drawn 1+ 77% 2
Gabriel Sara shots total 1+ 76% 5
Sydney van Hooijdonk shots total 1+ 76% 1
Marcelino Núñez shots total 1+ 76% 4
Hakeem Odofin fouls committed 1+ 76% 0
Charlie Wyke fouls committed 1+ 74% 2
Sam Nombe fouls committed 1+ 74% 1
Gabriel Sara fouls drawn 1+ 74% 1
Andy Rinomhota fouls committed 1+ 74% 1

How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
Match goals O2.5 51% 5 goals
BTTS Yes 46% No
Match cards O4.5 30% 1 cards

How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Norwich v Rotherham United?

10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Norwich v Rotherham United?

The most confident call it got wrong was Jordan Hugill at 89% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.