Oxford United v Sunderland
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Oxford United beat Sunderland 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Wilson Isidor for 1+ shots total (83%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Tom Watson for 1+ shots total (75%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Isidor | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tyler Goodrham | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 2 | ✓ |
| Mark Harris | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Patrick Roberts | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tom Watson | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Przemysław Płacheta | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Leo Fuhr Hjelde | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Enzo Le Fée | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rúben Rodrigues | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dennis Cirkin | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Will Vaulks | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 2 | ✓ |
| Trai Hume | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
| Przemysław Płacheta | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 2 | ✓ |
| Enzo Le Fée | fouls drawn | 1+ | 69% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 63% | 4 cards | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 43% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 38% | 2 goals | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards · BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sunderland 2–0 Oxford United Oct 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Oxford United v Sunderland?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Oxford United v Sunderland?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tom Watson at 75% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.